A Study of Stability and Pericavity Strain in an Underground Cavern Group for Compressed Air Energy Storage
Abstract
The stability of underground caverns for compressed air energy storage (CAES) is critical for safe operation under high internal pressure conditions. With the development of large-scale CAES power plants, a single storage cavern can no longer meet energy storage demands, making the study of cooperative stability in cavern groups of significant engineering importance. Based on a three-dimensional numerical simulation method, this study establishes a cavern group model to systematically investigate the influence of burial depth, cavern diameter, and spacing on surrounding rock deformation and plastic zone distribution, with a particular focus on the stability of intersecting regions. The results indicate that: (1) Surrounding rock deformation decreases with increasing burial depth but exhibits an upward trend with larger cavern diameters. When the spacing exceeds 1.5D, the deformation gradually stabilizes. (2) Under an operating pressure of 15 MPa, the optimal layout parameters for the cavern group are a burial depth of 200 m, a cavern diameter of 5 m, and a spacing of 1.5D. (3) Displacement in intersecting regions is generally higher than in single-cavern sections, particularly at the connection between vertical shafts and main caverns, where deformation shows asymmetry, with greater displacement on the side adjacent to neighboring caverns, indicating significant interaction effects within the cavern group. This study provides a theoretical basis for the optimal design of underground CAES cavern groups under high internal pressure conditions.
Article type: Research article
Cited as:
Han ZC, Fan MM, Xu DB, et al. 2025. A Study of Stability and Pericavity Strain in an Underground Cavern Group for Compressed Air Energy Storage. GeoStorage, 1(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.46690/gs.2025.01.04
Keywords:
Compressed air energy sotrage (CAES), cavern group, numerical simulation, intersection region, layout parametersReferences
Budt M, Wolf D, Span R, et al. 2016. A review on compressed air energy storage: basic principles, past milestones and recent developments. Applied Energy, 170: 250-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.108.
Chen LJ, Zheng TW, Mei SW, et al. 2016. Review and prospect of compressed air energy storage system. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 4(4): 529-541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-016-0240-5.
Chen X, Wang JG. 2022. Stability analysis for compressed air energy storage cavern with initial excavation damage zone in an abandoned mining tunnel. Journal of Energy Storage, 45, 103725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103725.
Crotogino F, Mohmeyer KU, Scharf R. 2001. Huntorf CAES: more than 20 years of successful operation. The Solution Mining Research Institute Spring Meeting, Orlando, Orlando, 23-25 April 2001.
Fang J, Ma H, Yang C, et al. 2024. Airtightness evaluation of lined caverns for compressed air energy storage under thermo-hydro-mechanical (THM) coupling. Energy, 308, 132996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132996.
Han Y, Cui H, Ma H, et al. 2022. Temperature and pressure variations in salt compressed air energy storage (CAES) caverns considering the air flow in the under ground wellbore. Journal of Energy Storage, 52: 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104846.
Jia SP, Jin FM, Zheng DW, et al. 2015. Evaluation indices and classification criterion of aquifer site for gas storage. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 34(8): 1628-1640. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2014.1197.
Li L, Liang WG, Lian HJ, et al. 2018. Compressed air energy storage: characteristics, basic principles, and geological considerations. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2(2): 135-147. https://doi.org/10.26804/ager.2018.02.03.
Li Y, Li Y, Liu Y, et al. 2021. Compressed air energy storage in aquifers: basic principles, considerable factors, and improvement approaches. Reviews in Chemical Engineering, 37: 561-584. https://doi.org/10.1515/revce-2019-0015.
Li P, Kang H, Zhu Q, et al. 2023. Numerical and experimental investigations of concrete lined compressed air energy storage system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, 136153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136153.
Ma Y, Rao Q, Huang D, et al. 2022. A new theoretical model of local air-leakage seepage field for the compressed air energy storage lined cavern. Journal of Energy Storage, 49, 104160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104160.
Sun GH, Yi Q, Yao YF, et al. 2024. Study of potential in stability modes in tunnel-type lined rock caverns of compressed air energy storage power plants. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 43(1):41-49. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2023.0199.
Sun GH, Wang J, Yu XY, et al. 2024. Research progress on basic principles and analysis methods of lined rock caverns for compressed air energy storage station. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 46(1): 1-25. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2024.0705.
Tooseh EK, Jafari A, Teymouri A. 2018. Gas-water-rock interactions and factors affecting gas storage capacity during natural gas storage in a low permeability aquifer. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 45(6): 1123-1128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30115-0.
Tunsakul J, Jongpradist P, Kongkitkul W, et al. 2013. Investigation of failure behavior of continuous rock mass around cavern under high internal pressure. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 34: 110-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.11.004.
Wang Z, Li W, Qiao L, et al. 2021. Effects of rate-dependent behavior of sandstone on performance of gas storage in aquifer. Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment, 100262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2021.100262.
Xia CC, Zhou Y, Zhou SW, et al. 2015. A simplified and unified analytical solution for temperature and pressure variations in compressed air energy storage caverns. Renew Energy, 74:718-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.058.
Xu YJ, Zhou SW, Xia CC, et al. 2021. Three-dimensional thermo-mechanical analysis of abandoned mine drifts for underground compressed air energy storage: a comparative study of two construction and plugging schemes. Journal of Energy Storage, 39, 102696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102696.
Xu YJ, Xia CC, Zhou SW, et al. 2022. Anti-uplift failure criterion of caverns for compressed air energy storage based on the upper bound theorem of limit analysis. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 41(10): 1971-1980. https://doi.org/10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2022.0018.
Yang CH, Wang TT, LI YY, et al. 2015. Feasibility analysis of using abandoned salt caverns for large-scale underground energy storage in China. Applied Energy, 137:467-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.07.048.
Zhang XJ, Gao ZY, Zhou BQ, et al. 2024. Advanced Compressed Air Energy Storage Systems: Fundamentals and Applications. Engineering, 34: 246-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2023.12.008.
Zhao K, Yang C, Ma H, et al. Daemen. 2023. A creep-fatigue model of rock salt and its application to the deformation analysis of CAES salt caverns. Computers and Geotechnics, 156:105311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105311.
Zhao K, Ma H, Li H, et al. 2023. Stability analysis of CAES salt caverns using a creep-fatigue model in Yunying salt district, China. Journal of Energy Storage, 62:106856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106856.
Zhou SW, Xia CC, Du SG, et al. 2015. An analytical solution for mechanical responses induced by temperature and air pressure in a lined rock cavern for underground compressed air energy storage. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 48(2): 749-770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0570-4.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 GeoStorage
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.